Europe

Judge Clarence Thomas: Courts Should Consider Contraception, Same-Sex Marriage, Gay Sex

https://sputniknews.com/20220625/justice-clarence-thomas-court-should-examine-contraception-same-sex-marriage-and-gay-sex-1096647512.html

Judge Clarence Thomas: Courts Should Consider Contraception, Same-Sex Marriage, Gay Sex

Judge Clarence Thomas: Courts Should Consider Contraception, Same-Sex Marriage, Gay Sex

On Friday, the Supreme Court announced a decision to overturn the Roe v. Wade case, opening the door for the state to ban abortion. There are laws in 22 states … 25.06.2022, Sputnik International

2022-06-25T03: 44 + 0000

2022-06-25T03: 44 + 0000

2022-06-25T03: 44 + 0000

scotus

Clarence Thomas

Roe v. Wade

/ html / head / meta[@name=”og:title”]/@content

/ html / head / meta[@name=”og:description”]/@content

https://cdnn1.img.sputniknews.com/img/07e6/05/0f/1095518201_0:0:3072:1728_1920x0_80_0_0_869627619736ff2cfe7444e5880bce58.jpg

Judge Clarence Thomas of the Supreme Court wants the court to consider other decisions following Friday’s reversal of the Roe v. Wade case. Thomas quoted cases involving same-sex marriage, contraception, and gay sex. In another, but agreeing opinion, Judge Thomas, 74, stated that cases decided on the basis of “substantive due process” should be reviewed as overturned Dobbs cases. Roe proved that “substantive due process decisions are” clearly wrong “.” He asked the court to “correct the mistakes established in these precedents.” v. Hodges.Griswold is a 1965 proceeding that established the couple’s right to access contraception, and Lawrence is a 2003 proceeding that banned the state from outlawing gay sex under agreement, Obergefell. Was a 2015 proceeding that established the right to same-sex marriage. Conservative justice later stated that “substantive due process is a constitutionally unfounded oxymoron.” He did not say how to rule each case, but said the court should decide. Judge Samuel Alito, who wrote the court’s opinion, an important question, “whether privilege or disclaimer protects rights not listed in the Constitution, and if so, how to identify those rights.” Emphasized that the decision should not be made. Interpreted to apply to other issues. “We emphasize that our decision relates to the constitutional right to abortion and not to other rights,” Arito wrote. Thomas said in his opinion that he agreed with the court that the Dobbs case does not apply to other rights, so the court needs to consider other cases using similar legal arguments. .. Stephen Breyer, Elena Cagan, and Sonia Sotomayor warned that Thomas’ remarks indicate that he plans to use Friday’s ruling to overturn the rulings in these cases.[A]At least one judge plans to use the ticket for today’s decision over and over again, “they write.

https://sputniknews.com/20220624/biden-says-scotus-roe-v-wade-ruling-took-away-americans-constitutional-right-1096638742.html

https://sputniknews.com/20220624/trump-hails-supreme-courts-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-1096637827.html

Sputnik International

Feedback@sputniknews.com

+74956456601

MIA “Rosiya Segodnya”

2022

Sputnik International

Feedback@sputniknews.com

+74956456601

MIA “Rosiya Segodnya”

news

en_EN

Sputnik International

Feedback@sputniknews.com

+74956456601

MIA “Rosiya Segodnya”

https://cdnn1.img.sputniknews.com/img/07e6/05/0f/1095518201_263:0:2994:2048_1920x0_80_0_0_900516a6c8b4b11f2fe66ea8594810d2.jpg

Sputnik International

Feedback@sputniknews.com

+74956456601

MIA “Rosiya Segodnya”

Sputnik International

Feedback@sputniknews.com

+74956456601

MIA “Rosiya Segodnya”

scotus, clarence thomas, roev. wade

On Friday, the Supreme Court announced a decision to overturn the Roe v. Wade case, opening the door for the state to ban abortion. Twenty-two states have legislative or constitutional amendments that prohibit or severely restrict access to abortion and come into effect shortly after the court overturns the Roe v. Wade case.

Judge Clarence Thomas of the Supreme Court wants the court to consider other decisions following Friday’s reversal of the Roe v. Wade case. Thomas quoted cases including same-sex marriage, contraception, and gay sex.

Separately But agreeJudge Thomas, 74, said that the Dobbs case, which overturned Law, proved that “the decision of the substantive due process was” clearly wrong “, so it was decided based on the” substantive due process “. Should be reviewed. ” “Fix errors” established in these precedents. “

Thomas specifically pointed out Griswold vs. Connecticut, Lawrence vs. Texas, and Obergefell vs. Hodges.

Griswold was the 1965 incident Established rights Lawrence banned the state from outlawing gay sex under agreement in 2003 to give couples access to contraception, and Obergefell established the right to same-sex marriage in 2015 It was a year litigation.

Biden states SCOTUS Roe v Wade Ruling’Took Away’Americans’ Constitutional Right

Conservative justice will say it later “Substantive due process is a constitutionally unfounded oxymoron.”

He did not say how to rule each case, but said the court should decide on important questions. “Whether a privilege or disclaimer protects rights not listed in the Constitution, and if so, includes ways to identify those rights.”

Judge Samuel Alito, who wrote the court’s opinion, emphasized that this decision should not be construed as applying to other issues. “We emphasize that our decision relates to the constitutional right to abortion and not to other rights.” Arito wrote.

With his consent, Judge Brett Kavanaugh agreed, saying: “In this opinion, nothing should be understood that casts doubt on cases unrelated to abortion.”

Former President Donald Trump will speak at a rally on May 28, 2022 in Casper, Wyoming-Sputnik International, 1920, June 24, 2022.

“God has made a decision”: Trump welcomes the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Roe v. Wade case

Thomas said in his opinion that he agreed with the court that the Dobbs case does not apply to other rights, so the court needs to consider other cases using similar legal arguments. ..

“No court opinion should be understood that casts doubt on cases unrelated to abortion.” Thomas wrote. “Therefore, in the future, we need to revisit all the precedents of this court’s substantive due process, including Griswold, Lawrence and Obergefell.”

Opposition written by liberal judges Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor show that Thomas’ remarks plan to use Friday’s decision to overturn the rulings in these cases. I warned that there was.

“”[A]At least one judge plans to use the ticket for today’s decision over and over again. “ They wrote.

https://sputniknews.com/20220625/justice-clarence-thomas-court-should-examine-contraception-same-sex-marriage-and-gay-sex-1096647512.html Judge Clarence Thomas: Courts Should Consider Contraception, Same-Sex Marriage, Gay Sex

Back to top button