Respect for marriage law voting clears the house. What does the Senate do?

A bipartisan representative group passed a bill on Tuesday to codify same-sex marriage into federal law, which is already facing uphill in the evenly divided Senate.

The bill comes in fear that the current conservative majority of the Supreme Court may vote to overturn the 2015 case that ensured constitutional protection for same-sex marriage. ..

The bill is Respect for marriage lawAbolishes the Defense of Marriage Act of 1996, which defines marriage only as a bond between men and women, and prevents the state from denying the right to marry same-sex or interracial couples.

The Marriage Respect Act was passed with a final vote of 267 to 157, with 47 Republicans joining the Democratic majority.

The bill was submitted by Congressman Jerry Nadler, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.

Is bipartisan support possible?

To reach President Joe Biden’s desk, the Filibuster Rule must pass the Senate, which requires a majority of 60 votes. Assuming that all 50 Democrats are in favor, at least 10 Senate Republicans should be in favor.

That seems unlikely, given that many Republicans have traditionally opposed worshiping same-sex marriage. This includes Senator Ted Cruz, R-Texas, who said on the weekend that the Supreme Court, which ruled that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry, was “clearly wrong.”

Cruz made a comment clip From his podcast “Verdict with Ted Cruz” uploaded to YouTube on Saturday.

What Texas Senator Ted Cruz said

See last month’s Supreme Court ruling Overturn the Roe v. Wade case, Cruz, who legalized abortion, used similar reasoning to argue that the legality of same-sex marriage should be entrusted to the state. Roe v. Like Wade, Obergefellv. The Hodges — a groundbreaking 2015 proceeding to legalize same-sex marriage — was decided on the basis of the protection given in the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.

• “Marriage has always been a problem left in the state,” Cruz said. “We saw the states before the Oberfell v Hodge trial. Some states were working to allow gay marriages, while others were to allow civil partnerships. It was working. If there were various standards adopted by the state and the court had not ruled the Oberfell v. Hodge case, the democratic process would have continued to work. “
• “The decision was clearly wrong when it was decided,” Cruz said, calling the decision “overkill.”

Can the Supreme Court overturn the right to same-sex marriage?

Many LGBTQ activists have expressed concern that the Supreme Court may limit their right to marriage, following Judge Clarence Thomas’s opinion in court. Need to rethink Cases involving contraception, intimacy, and the right to same-sex marriage.

However, Cruz says that the right to same-sex marriage is treated differently by courts because many couples are already married and, unlike abortion, do not involve “killing humans.” ..

• “Many people have gay marriages. It would be quite chaotic for courts to do something that would somehow confuse a marriage that was done according to the law,” he said.