What if we are able to’t fill sufficient board seats? – Orange County Register

Q: I reside in an affiliation with a number of hundred members the place it’s very often troublesome to fill our seven-member board. What would occur if solely two individuals had been on the board or if nobody was excited about being on the board? How would selections be made? — R.M., Anaheim.

A: If the HOA has too few administrators to achieve board quorum, the Companies Code gives assist. Companies Code Part 7224(a) permits the seated administrators by majority to vote and appoint volunteers to fill the open seats. The Open Assembly Act doesn’t enable non-emergency motion exterior conferences, so an introduced board assembly is required to fill the vacancies. Nevertheless, till ample vacancies are crammed to create a quorum, the board could not take every other motion.

The commonest cause owners hesitate to volunteer for board service is that they see board members placing in hours every week which can be far too intimidating a dedication.

Administrators who’re so dedicated that they’re virtually co-managers together with administration are unwittingly making a predicament for his or her HOA – no person else is in a position or keen to place in so many weekly hours serving the HOA.

On this circumstance, take into account a gathering with administration to debate reallocating extra duties to administration in order that volunteer administrators are primarily directing, merely making selections based mostly upon the work, investigation, and suggestions of their skilled administration.

Q: If our bylaws say “no proxy voting,” and our election guidelines say, “proxy voting is permitted,” which one prevails? If proxy voting is permitted by an HOA, what’s the process for doing so, please, Kelly?  We’ve heard numerous opinions! Our board additionally solely permits the membership to debate agenda objects on the END of board conferences when generally the board has already voted on an merchandise!  Is that this OK? Lastly, ought to the membership be allowed to contribute objects to board agendas? — J.M., San Diego

A: Civil Code Part 4205(d) establishes a hierarchy of governing paperwork and guidelines are on the backside of that hierarchy. Guidelines could not battle with the CC&Rs or bylaws. So, if the bylaws ban proxies, the election guidelines could not re-establish their use. The one exception to this hierarchy is that if one thing within the CC&Rs or bylaws violates the legislation.

In that case, pursuant to Part 4205(a) the legislation controls and overrides the unlawful CC&R or bylaw provision. So, in that state of affairs, a rule merely following the legislation just isn’t thought of a contradiction of the unlawful CC&Rs or bylaws provision and doesn’t violate Part 4205.

I don’t suppose proxies in HOAs are useful, aside from the aim of attaining quorum. Given the prevailing 30-day voting course of, primarily an absentee poll system, no person wants to provide anybody their proxy as a result of everybody can simply vote for themselves. Sadly, the legislation could be very lax concerning proxies, offering solely minimal necessities concerning their validity and usually not offering instruments for a state of affairs the place the authenticity of a proxy is questionable.

Relating to when to conduct an open discussion board, I imagine the higher time is earlier within the assembly, however that point needs to be restricted. Relating to agendas, keep in mind, it’s nonetheless the board’s assembly in order that they set their agenda.

Kelly G. Richardson, Esq. is a Fellow of the School of Neighborhood Affiliation Legal professionals and Accomplice of Richardson Ober LLP, a California legislation agency recognized for group affiliation recommendation. Submit column inquiries to

Back to top button